Methodology for Afforestation & Reforestation

Modified on Tue, 9 Sep at 12:51 PM


These FAQs refer to the Gold Standard methodology Afforestation & Reforestation



SECTIONS 


Scope & Eligibility

Can project areas that have been deforested within the last 10 years be eligible under the A/R methodology? 

As per the Land-Use & Forestry Activity Requirements  paragraph 2.1.1: The eligible area shall not meet the definition of forest 10 years before project start date and at project start date. 

In the case when the eligible area has been deforested during the last 10 years prior to project start date, the eligibility of the project shall be determined by Gold Standard as part of the Preliminary Review. The Project Developer shall provide evidence that the deforestation activity has not taken place with an intention to implement project activities that generate Gold Standard Certified SDG Impact Statements and/or Products, such as GSVERs.  

The project shall also observe any host country requirements for reforestation activities. 

Are there geographical restrictions on A/R projects? 

Gold Standard’s A/R methodology is applicable globally, provided that the eligibility conditions of the methodology and our core principles and requirements are met.  

There are no direct requirements on minimum or maximum area in a project however, micro scale or smallholder projects have certain caps, which are outlined here. 

Are bamboo plantations eligible under the methodology? 

For the practical use of the A/R methodology document, the definition of a tree goes beyond the scientific definition and also includes shrubs, palms and bamboo plants. Differences in the context of specific requirements are noted on the individual pages of the methodology. This is applicable globally.

Gold Standard may include additional modules specific to Bamboo in future versions of the methodology. 


Does Gold Standard define a list of eligible tree species for planting? 

The A/R methodology does not have species eligibility requirements. However, selected species must comply with the  Safeguarding Principles & Requirements  for environment, ecology and land use.  

It is the responsibility of the project developer to select the most appropriate species for the ecosystem and management plan. 


How long should land rights be demonstrated for? 

In line with the Land-Use & Forestry Activity Requirements , projects shall demonstrate secured titles for the entire crediting period. The minimum length of crediting for an A/R project is 30 years, and cannot go beyond 50 years. 

What are the requirements in countries with customary land rights? 

The  Land-Use & Forestry Activity Requirements  section 2 (b) outlines the standard requirements for demonstrating Secured Titles within LUF projects.  However, we appreciate that there are regional differences that need to be considered.  

A project developer’s approach to demonstrating secured  land  titles in the context of  customary  land  tenure will need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis following ourDeviations Procedure.  

When submitting the deviation request, it’s important to consider: 


How can projects scale and add new project areas? 

To add new areas to a standalone project, developers shall follow the new area certification requirements in the Land-Use and Forestry Activity Requirements.  

Some project developers may also choose to develop a Programme of Activities, which allows the streamlined inclusion of similar projects. For projects that plan to scale in the future, developers may wish to consider the benefits of a PoA, which are summarised here.  


Forestry Approaches

What are the additional requirements for rotation forestry projects? 

In line with our Rule Clarification, for A/R rotation forestry projects: 

  • The crediting period shall cover the full rotation cycles (e.g. 15 year rotation period project should have a crediting period between 30 and 45 years) 
  • The plantation must remain standing at the end of the crediting period 
  • CO2-performance shall be assessed against the original growth models rather than the models with long-term averages 
  • In a performance shortfall scenario, VVB and PD shall follow the Performance Shortfall Guidelines.
  • To assess the accuracy of the long-term average, the performance verification shall always take place in the year prior to the felling of the trees (regardless of when the previous or next verification audit takes place). 


The excel tool itself is not mandatory; it is intended for illustrative purposes, using a specific example based on the version of the methodology applicable at the time of the tool’s publication. 

Please note that while the Excel tool available on the Gold Standard website can be referred to, the project model must be developed based on the specific conditions and scenario of each project. Ultimately, the VVB will assess the appropriateness and accuracy of the applied model during validation. 

How does Gold Standard define selective harvesting? 

Selective harvesting is done through the continuous harvest of single trees or groups of trees by maintaining forest on the area.


Can a project apply different silvicultural practices within project area? 

Yes, if different approaches are applied (and therefore different CO2 removal approaches), then a project could divide the project area into different modelling units that apply different approaches e.g some of the project area is used for rotation forestry and the rest follows a conservation approach. 


Soil Organic Carbon

How can project developers quantify soil organic carbon (SOC) within their A/R project? 

There are two important distinctions for the calculation SOC in A/R Projects: 

1. Quantifying SOC increase from plantation activities only.  

Project developers may choose to apply the A/R Soil Carbon Tool as per paragraph 3.1.5 of the A/R Methodology, or follow the quantification methods outlined in the SOC Framework Methodology which allows for a sampling-based approach.  

2. Quantifying SOC increase from specific, soil-related interventions.  

E.g. A project developer wants to apply a biostimulant to increase SOC within the A/R project boundary. 

Project developers shall apply the Soil Organic Carbon Framework Methodology, alongside an applicable Activity Module(s) for their intervention.  

E.g. The project may apply multiple methodologies within the same PDD:

  1. The A/R Methodology for plantation activities. 
  2. The SOC Framework Methodology + Biostimulant Activity Module for specific SOC intervention. 


Safeguarding Biodiversity & Water Bodies

Does the minimum 10% HCV requirement apply to each parcel of land, or the total project area? 

The minimum 10% HCV requirement applies to the total project area (including eligible, ineligible, buffer area etc.), rather than each plot of land. It must be demonstrated that minimum 10% of the total project area follows an HCV approach, this may be concentrated in certain plots but must be clearly defined and justified to the VVB. 

It’s important to note that 10% is a minimum requirement and, by design, many projects may exceed this. 

How should water bodies be defined within the project boundary? 

The project developer shall apply their expert judgment and scientific understanding to accurately define permanent and temporary water bodies. The  availability of data, as well as the  definition and threshold used to classify water bodies, must be clearly justified to the VVB. 

Can the minimum 10% HCV zone include water body buffers? 

Yes, the minimum 10% HCV zone may also include riparian buffers. 

Can projects claim credits for increases in carbon stocks within designated buffer zones? 

Yes, project developers may still include these areas in their removals calculations provided the requirements detailed in paragraph 3.1.6 of Land-use & Forests Activity Requirements – Gold Standard for the Global Goals are  met. 


Smallholder & Microscale Requirements

What are the simplified requirements and procedures available to Smallholder & Microscale Activities? 

To support the development of smallholder activities, project developers may apply the requirements in Annex B of the Land-Use & Forestry Activity Requirements . 

Microscale activities may also benefit from discounted fees and the provisions in the Micro-Scale Project Requirements. 

How are smallholder projects defined? 

Following a Rule Update, a project is a smallholder project if it only includes project areas where individual participants;  

  • own or lease no more than 3 ha of land in the host country. In case of leased land, the project must provide evidence that the leaser has been leasing the land for the past 5 years. In case project involves community owned land, the project developer must provide evidence that the average land assigned to each community member is 3ha or less; AND  
  • are defined as low-income communities according to host country definition. 


A smallholder project shall;  


The simplified requirements in Annex B of the LUF Activity Requirements may be applied by smallholder projects that are either micro or small-scale in nature and meet the maximum area requirements: 

Projects eligible to apply Annex B 

 

Smallholder & Small-scale 

Smallholder & Micro-scale 

Maximum Area 

No Limit 

500 ha 

Maximum VERs per year 

16,000 tCO2e / yr 

10,000 tCO2e 


Forest Inventories

How should project developers conduct forest inventories? 

Project developers shall follow the requirements in section 3.11 of the methodology and the forest inventory guidelines outlined in the BioCarbon Fund Guidebook. 

Can project developers apply a census-based approach? 

Monitoring should follow the methodology, however, if developers want to apply a modified approach, then may deviation request for this.  
 
Please fill in the  Deviation Request form  following the process in  Deviations Approval Requirements and Procedures. Deviation requests will be reviewed by our Technical team and approved, partially approved, or rejected. Occasionally, unique and complex cases may be brought to the  Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)  for their input. 
 

Are remote sensing methods eligible under the methodology? 

Remote sensing may be used by developers, however, at this stage, it must be applied in parallel with the current methodological requirements. For remote sensing to become integrated as a standalone approach, the true costs and accuracy of approaches need to be understood.  

Gold Standard and Spatial Informatics Group (SIG) have developed a new protocol, the ‘Tree Remote Environmental Evaluation’. The protocol was designed to assess the accuracy and uncertainty of tree biomass estimates based on remote sensing and will soon be piloted to understand how accurate remote sensing estimates of tree biomass can be, with the potential application to Gold Standard products.  

Methodology Updates

Gold Standard is revising the A/R methodology as part of its planned update cycle. We plan to publish the draft methodology for public consultation in Q4 this year, with the final version expected following Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) approval. 

 

The planned updates consider:

 

  • Advancements in Science and Technology: Updates may integrate new scientific and technological tools to improve accuracy in forest carbon stock measurement and monitoring.
  • Stakeholder Feedback: Methodology revisions are informed by input from project developers and VVBs to address practical challenges and strengthen implementation.
  • Regulatory Changes: Updates ensure methodologies are aligned with evolving international standards such as Article 6.
  • Addressing Legacy Issues: Lessons from past projects will be incorporated to the enhance robustness and reliability in tackling persistent challenges.
  • Integration of New Data: Emerging datasets, such as satellite imagery and improved forest inventories, may be leveraged to increase accuracy and credibility in carbon accounting.
  • Market Demand and Opportunities: Revising the methodology to better align with market needs to enhance its attractiveness to potential project developers and investors. 

 

The revisions are overseen by the Gold Standard Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Secretariat and a committee of external experts.


For any remaining questions please contact us at help@goldstandard.org


Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article