Can transitioning GS-CER projects replace the applied CDM methodology with a Gold Standard/other GS approved methodology?

What changes or flexibilities have been provided for projects issuing carbon credits against Annex 3 of the TPDDTEC methodology?

This new methodology may significantly reduce the amount of carbon credits generated through safe water supply projects. Are you concerned that it may impact the financial viability of new safe water projects development?

What is the rationale for including both a water quality test and a hygiene practice modifier?

Which methodology version needs to be followed when transitioning CDM projects and PoAs?

Why is the scope of the new methodology reduced to only drinking water?

What is the grace period for safe water projects using Annex 3 of ‘Technologies and Practices for the Displacement of Decentralised Thermal Energy Consumption (TPDDTEC)’ methodology?

How do Fairtrade Carbon Credit projects benefit producer communities?

How can we know if an emission reduction is real?

What flexibility is Gold Standard providing for CDM projects/PoA/CPA that are planning to pursue provisional issuance of 2021 vintage CERs under the CDM, considering that the 2021 vintage CERs may or may not be approved by the CMP at COP 26